The Challenges and Opportunities; CIPP Model for Evaluation for TEFL Following the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37087/jtb.v2i1.12Keywords:
CIPP model, online Learning, COVID-19, program evaluationAbstract
This study are focused in : (1) how the context of the Online teaching learning process program on Covid-19 outbreak. (2) how the input of the Online teaching learning process program on Covid-19 to the success program, (3) how far the challenge and the opportunities of the Online teaching learning process program on Covid-19 pandemic.
The objects of this study were: the English teacher in government’ schools and private school of junior high school and senior high school, and the students. The data were obtained from interview, classroom observation, and document analysis. Those data were analyzed by using Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model by Kellaghan and Stufflebeam (2003).
The findings revealed some facts. First, in the context evaluation, it can be concluded that the online teaching and learning program are relevant and formulated in order to meet the students’ needs on this pandemic. Second, in term of input evaluation, the teacher did not fulfill the requirements of a qualified teacher yet. Therefore, this pandemic has become a challenge for educators especially for English teachers and students in higher education level. It impacted classrooms to be hardly. Here, the researcher advice the government to conduct a training and workshop in order to improve the quality and the professionalism.
References
Awal akbar jamaluddin 2016 model-model pembelajaran tatap muka malang universitas negeri malang prees.
Bomer, R. A. N. D. Y. (2017). What would it mean for English language arts to become more culturally responsive and sustaining?. Voices from the Middle, 24(3), 11.
Christenbury, L., Bomer, R., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of adolescent literacy research. Guilford Press.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex, England: Longman.
Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.
Mirsha, S., & Sharma, R. C. (2005). Interactive Multimedia in Education and Training. London: Idea Group.
Mustangin, M. (2019). Improve Student Engagement and Collaboration with Kahoot!. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.37087/jtb.v1i1.6
Nugraha, I. S., & Suherdi, D. (2017). Scientific approach: an english learning-teaching (ELT) approach in the 2013 curriculum. Journal of English and Education, 5(2), 120-135.
Savignon, S. J. (1972). Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign-Language Teaching. Language and the Teacher: A Series in Applied Linguistics, Volume 12.https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/PDF/SAGE-Publishing_Coronavirus-Related-Articles-1586301930390.pdf
Stufflebeam, D.L. & Kellaghan, T. (2003). International handbook of educational evaluation, 1-6 (eds.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wu, Y. W., Wen, M. H., & Sun, C. R. (2017, May). An architectural design teaching strategy based on online-to-offline (O2O) integration and blended learning. In 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) (pp. 111-113). IEEE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Mustangin, Beny Riswanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
